What Onshape and Fusion have in common is a subscription only system, which removes much of the barrier to first users. Coupled with the cost of the cheapest subscription, that was pretty steep for hobby use and I've also tried to keep an eye on being able to access my work in the future, having created work in a few different systems. However, these are professionally priced and the closest I found to being affordable back then was Sprutcam at a cool £1000 a pop. So for CAM, they have connectors to the likes of Sprutcam, Mastercam, Visualcam etc. Unlike Fusion, the core product is CAD only and they rely on 3rd parties to provide "connectors" to their programs. The aspects that put me off were the limitation on the size and number of files you could work with before requiring the professionally priced subscription and the cost of the plug-ins. It was actually set up by the team who originally implemented Solidworks, so they knew a thing or two about CAD. In many respects it's rather like Fusion 360, particularly in terms of the interface and the "joints". I was a beta tester for Onshape back in Feb 2015 and found it quite a refreshing alternative to the premium priced alternatives I had access to at the time (Solidworks and Solid Edge). Thread: For discussing the merits of alternative 3D CAD programs. It takes the CCMT / CCGT inserts although be aware there are several different sizes. #Cetus3d software crash isoSuspect they are a proprietary system that may predate the ISO std.Įdit - should have said that the SCLCR is probably the most common boring bar style we encounter. There's a quick guide here although most manufacturers will include it in their catalogues of industry std tools. It's an ISO std (as is the insert designation). The "SCLCR" designator tells you what the toolholder looks like and what insert it takes. #Cetus3d software crash codeThe code numbers on the holders do not seem to match those on replacement insert websites eg: I'd trade it in for a Korean alternative if I could actually find a large estate from those environs. Costs an arm and several legs to run, goes through tires and brake pads like they are going out of fashion and parts fail all over the shop. Once the short warranty has run out, the dealers coin it in. Ended up getting a BMW and the contrast couldn't be more disappointing - the Which reports claimed it was reasonably reliable. I had a whole series (5) of Honda Accords until Honda stopped selling them in Europe. #Cetus3d software crash driverIt has the same torque vs angle behaviour, so it will behave in exactly the same way as the un-microstepped motor, assuming the driver is capable of processing the higher frequency pulse train. Each microstep now represents 1/10 of the fundamental step - and oddly enough a movement of the motor by a 1/10 of a step from the commanded position generates 1/10 of the torque. If you generate 10x microsteps, you haven't magically redesigned the motor. The torque of a synchronous motor (including stepper motors) is proportional to the movement from the commanded position ("positional error". That's a common misconception but you should save your worry for something else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |